Z: Why vis?

Coding: Streeb, Dirk: S. Bertschi and N. Bubenhofer [2005]: Linguistic Learning: A New Conceptual Focus in Knowledge Visualization doi:10.1109/IV.2005.71 - 24.01.18 13:01

Publication S. Bertschi and N. Bubenhofer [2005]: Linguistic Learning: A New Conceptual Focus in Knowledge Visualization doi:10.1109/IV.2005.71
Coder Streeb, Dirk
Completed
Off topic
Comment From spreadsheet
Last updated 3 years, 4 months ago (June 6, 2018) by Streeb, Dirk

Tags (4)


Nodes (18)

Context disambiguates (+) Positive
Space carries meaning (+) Positive
Symbols carry „cultural“ meaning (=) Neutral
Visuailzations clarify common ground (?) Questioned
Visualizaitons impose the need to follow basic semantic figures in discourse (-) Negative
Visualizations abstract structures (+-) Ambivalent
Visualizations aid in communication / presentation (+) Positive
Visualizations are aesthetic (+) Positive
Visualizations are combined with language (+) Positive
Visualizations are easy to memorize (+) Positive
Visualizations are in line with the pictoral mode of thinking (+) Positive
Visualizations group information (+) Positive
Visualizations offer rich means of expression (+) Positive
Visualizations require experience and domain context (-) Negative
Visualizations retain complexity (-) Negative
Visualizations show visual patterns (+-) Ambivalent
Visualizations use analogies (+-) Ambivalent
Visual statements show invisibles (+) Positive
Node Affirmation Extent Reference Quote

Links (0)

Link Affirmation Extent Reference Quote

Comments (0)