Z: Why vis?

Coding: Streeb, Dirk: P. Vickers, J. Faith and N. Rossiter [2013]: Understanding Visualization: A Formal Approach Using Category Theory and Semiotics doi:10.1109/TVCG.2012.294 - 26.02.18 13:51

Publication P. Vickers, J. Faith and N. Rossiter [2013]: Understanding Visualization: A Formal Approach Using Category Theory and Semiotics doi:10.1109/TVCG.2012.294
Coder Streeb, Dirk
Completed
Off topic
Comment Higher level of abstraction
Last updated 3 years, 4 months ago (June 6, 2018) by Streeb, Dirk

Tags (3)


Nodes (3)

Symbols carry meaning (+) Positive One or more paragraphs p. 1049 «Signs stand for or represent something beyond themselves.»
Visualizations are ambiguous (+-) Ambivalent One or more subsections sec. 5.1.4 «Sometimes this is a valuable property, for example, in representations that aggregate or filter large or complex data sets into simpler forms. In other situations, it is less desirable.»
Visualizations are (partially) redundant (*) Mentioned without valuation One or more subsections sec. 5.1.2
Node Affirmation Extent Reference Quote

Links (0)

Link Affirmation Extent Reference Quote

Comments (0)