Z: Why vis?

Publication: B. Tversky [2011]: Visualizing Thought doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01113.x

Fulltext Try KonSearchTry UnpaywallTry doai.io
Title Visualizing Thought
Authors
  1. Tversky, Barbara
Year 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01113.x
ISBN ---
@article{Tversky2011,
 title = {Visualizing Thought},
 author = {Tversky, Barbara},
 year = {2011},
 doi = {10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01113.x},
 journal = {Topics in Cognitive Science},
 number = {3},
 pages = {499--535},
 volume = {3}
}

Last updated 3 years, 5 months ago (Feb. 26, 2018) by Streeb, Dirk

Keywords


Tags (6)


Nodes (36)

Ambiguity/inconsistency catalyses ideas (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Context disambiguates (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Perception infers abstract structures (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Space carries meaning (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Spatial mappings conflict (-) Negative Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Symbols carry different meanings (-) Negative Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Symbols carry meaning (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Symbols carry „natural“ meaning (+-) Ambivalent Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visuailzations clarify common ground (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualization accumulates information (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualization is a reductive process (-) Negative Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations abstract structures (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations aid in communication / presentation (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations allow flexible notation (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations are combined with language (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations are discrete (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations are external physical entities (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations are forgiving (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations are globally stable (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations are objects to reference (can be pointed to) (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations are open for interaction (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations are open for mental interaction (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations distort usefully (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations drive attention (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations emphasize parts (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations enable application of visuospatial skills to abstract domains (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations enable discourse/collaboration (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations integrate views/data (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations make missing parts explicit (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations provide an additional explanation (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations require experience and domain context (-) Negative Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations re-represent structures (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations serve to focuse/reorganize/explore thoughts (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations show visual patterns (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visualizations support external memorization (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Visual statements show invisibles (+) Positive Streeb, Dirk: Jan. 25, 2018
Node Affirmation Extent Reference Quote Coding

Links (0)

Link Affirmation Extent Reference Quote Coding

Codings (1)

Streeb, Dirk Jan. 25, 2018 June 6, 2018 36 0 6 From spreadsheet
Details Coder Coding from Last updated Nodes coded Links coded Tags coded Comment

Comments (0)